A Frustrating Situation or a Frustrated Contract?

04 December 19

A FRUSTRATING SITUATION OR A FRUSTRATED CONTRACT?


We live in a world where we enter into contracts on a daily basis – whether we realise it or not. When we do so, there are many contract terms that we take for granted as we assume they are obvious terms that go without saying. For example, when you order a coffee you expect it in a cup; when you buy shoes you expect a left and a right. Sometimes what goes without saying though can be less than obvious.


If you contract with a pool cleaner to clean your pool every month for a year, but you end up emptying your pool for winter, do you pay for those months?
If you lease a shop, but the roof starts leaking, do you keep paying the rent?


If a Body Corporate pays a building manager to maintain its grounds, but the grounds are flooded for a month, does the Body Corporate pay for that month?


Sometimes these questions are clearly addressed at the time the contract is entered into. For example, most commercial leases address what happens when the leased property is no longer useable. The rent abates pro rata depending on the degree of continued usage.


However, what happens when there is no clear answer in the contract?


A contract that can’t be performed due to an intervening event that has substantially affected what was agreed to is referred to as a “frustrated” contract. An intervening event is something beyond your control that interferes with completing the contract – an act of God, for example. However, a Body Corporate emptying its pool for winter is not an act of God and accordingly, there is not discount applied to the Caretaker’s remuneration.


A frustrated contract ends at the point in time that an intervening event occurs that prevents the contract from continuing. Where possible, the Courts will resolve the contract in a just and fair manner – but this can be as simple as letting the chips fall where they lie.


But what about this situation?


You are the resident building manager of a holiday high-rise. Your Body Corporate has resolved to replace all external windows and balcony sliding doors due to corrosion. The Body Corporate also decides to externally paint the building at the same time.


You (and your letting owners) accept that it would be dangerous not to make these renovations. Problem is, the building is going to be covered in scaffolding for 18 months. Units will be incapable of being let for periods of time, owners will be hit with substantially reduced income, cleaning of the common property will increase dramatically because of tradesmen coming and going, your caretaking workload doubles and you estimate that your income from running the onsite letting business will be down $100k-$250k for the 18 months. This was a real case scenario I have come across on more than one occasion.


Surely you are entitled to compensation for the loss of your letting income? Surely the Body Corporate is going to increase your caretaking fee because of the additional work you have to do?


Simply put, there is no compensation payable for the loss of your letting income unless you can somehow link the loss to negligence on the part of the Body Corporate. The same applies to the unit owners in your letting pool. At best, this will be very difficult to prove and at worse, impossible to prove.

What about your caretaking remuneration? Are you entitled to an increase to cover the additional work? Unfortunately (and unfairly) in many cases, you will not be entitled to further remuneration. It all comes back to the wording in your caretaking agreement. Some agreements contemplate the building manager receiving an additional hourly rate payment for supervising work associated with payments out of the Body Corporate sinking fund. However, many agreements are silent on this point, which means that you may be caught by your general duties under your agreement to clean and maintain and you receive no more than your base remuneration.


Frustrating?

 

Article Written by Col Myers of Small Myers Hughes Lawyers

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Disclaimer – This article is provided for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. 

Additional Documents

Click here to download: 2019_12_Dec___A_Frustrating_Situation_or_A_Frustrated_Contract.pdf

Share

Contact Us Now

Phone:+ 61 7 5552 6666
Fax:+ 61 7 5528 0955
Email:info@smh.net.au
Address:Level 2, 17 Welch St Southport, Qld, 4215
Postal:PO Box 1876
Southport 4215

Search

Search*
Search

Most Popular Articles

Management Rights News

Number of news items returned: 1 to 15 records of 95

The Different Types of Caretaking Agreements

17 November 2014

(15953 views)

 Essentially, there are three types of caretaking agreements in the marketplace: “Do” agreements; “Supervisory” agreements; Hybrid “Do” and “Supervisory” agreements. “Do” Agreements A “Do” agreement ...

Unit Entitlement in NSW

11 February 2013

(9753 views)

The issue of unit entitlement was recently looked at again as part of the Department of Fair Trading’s Discussion Paper ...

CARETAKING AND LETTING AGREEMENT ESSENTIALS PART 5: DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND TERMINATION

16 July 2015

(8055 views)

This month, we continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be ...

Is it Time to Change the Management Rights Model?

13 May 2013

(7789 views)

I think the time is right for the management rights industry to explore the creation of a new model. I ...

What Managers Need to know about the NSW Child Window Safety Devices Act 2013

17 January 2014

(7504 views)

Resident building managers have general obligations under their Caretaking Agreements to assist Owners Corporations with building and compliance issues. Managers ...

Be Careful with your Proxies!

03 October 2013

(6160 views)

In June this year, I wrote an article headed “Proxy Farming”, which set out the relevant restrictions on caretakers using ...

The Law Relating to Management Rights in Queensland

14 June 2010

(5922 views)

This article looks at the legislation in Queensland dealing with the constraints and obligations imposed on developers whilst they control ...

Duty Bound or Duty Free - Do you know what Your Duties Are?

23 September 2013

(5452 views)

The day-to-day care and maintenance of your resort facilities and communal areas is essential to its ongoing performance and success. ...

Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 2014

(5194 views)

We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be ...

For Your Eyes Only!

15 April 2013

(5142 views)

Information is a commodity and for many, information is power. As you would most likely know from personal experience, the right ...

Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 2013

(5116 views)

In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability ...

Proxy Farming

10 June 2013

(4929 views)

It is often stated that Strata and Community Schemes represent the “fourth tier of Government” and, as such, voting (either ...

"Legal Action", All those in Favour say "Why"

15 July 2013

(4740 views)

I was recently involved in a New South Wales matter where an Executive Committee had received extensive legal advice from ...

Not Getting the Fundamentals Right

15 October 2013

(4456 views)

A recent decision of the NSW Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has highlighted the importance of ensuring that the ...

Manged Investment Schemes

15 July 2008

(4426 views)

You may have heard the terms ‘MIA’ or ‘Managed Investments Scheme’ and wondered what it’s all about. If you operate ...