Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 14

We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be approached by onsite managers or Owners Corporations who are seeking to revise and update their existing agreements. In many cases, the original agreements are over 10 years old and the caretaking duties are often no longer consistent with the needs of the scheme. Fixing outdated agreements is usually achieved by either varying the existing agreements or by re-engaging the onsite manager under new agreements.

Unlike the old days (when managers actually wanted agreements that included vague and generalised duties!) experience has proven that the lawyer’s goal these days is to be very clear and very concise when drafting caretaking agreements to avoid future disputes. Notwithstanding, unless 50-80 page agreements are to become the norm, there will still be issues that will arise from time to time that are simply not black and white and will need a bit of common sense to resolve.

In my experience, there are several essential clauses and concepts that a caretaking or letting agreement should include to be able to provide the best possible guidance to the onsite manager and the Owners Corporation. For example, clauses that address the following:

  • The annual revision of the remuneration.
  • The conditions for exercising an option.
  • Dispute resolution and termination processes.
  • Ownership of equipment and materials.
  • Owners Corporation spending limits and procedures.
  • Requirements for the manager to live onsite.
  • The Owners Corporation’s conditions for an assignment.
  • A duties schedule that clearly indicates what, where, when and how.
  • Duties that require specialists.
  • The performance of extra work outside of the duties.
  • Financier right of entry deeds.
  • The monitoring of By-laws.
  • Managing keys and other security.
  • Exclusive letting rights.
  • Work health and safety obligations.
  • Managed Investment Scheme requirements.

Over the coming months, I will be providing articles that elaborate on some of these with a view that you gain a better understanding of the issues involved and some of the strategies we recommend for overcoming them.

If there is a particular issue that you would like me to address in these articles, I’m always open to requests.

The Caretaker -v- Specialist Contractor

To get the ball rolling, let’s firstly look at the issue of determining whether a particular task should be properly performed by the onsite manager or by a specialist tradesperson at the Owners Corporation’s expense. Caretaking agreements usually provide very minimal guidance in determining which tasks should be performed by a tradesperson and this regularly leads to disputes when the onsite manager does not perform a task that the Owners Corporation believes it should.

Optimally, the caretaking agreement should provide one or more tests that can be applied to the circumstances at the time. For example:

  • Gardening maintenance and window cleaning that requires a ladder, scaffold or crane to reach areas higher than 1.8 metres from ground level should be performed by a specialist tradesperson.
  • Painting an entire wall, door or area greater than 10 square metres shall be performed by a specialist tradesperson.
  • Tasks requiring the use of specialised equipment no more than twice a year on average should be performed by a specialist tradesperson.

If your agreement does not have a clear test you can apply to your circumstances, it will be a matter of interpreting the surrounding clauses in the agreement and seeing if there are any other guiding principles that could be stretched to apply to the circumstances. Compliance with the Work Health and Safety obligations of the Owners Corporation should also be considered, especially if the onsite manager is ill-equipped or unqualified to meet those obligations. If there are no guiding principles in the agreement then it may be a matter of determining if there is an industry standard that might apply. It is also worth noting that insurance policies held by the Owners Corporation may require that certain maintenance be performed by certified service providers.

Using the argument that “it has always been done this way” is only of benefit when there is no test or guiding principle in the caretaking agreement. Just because something has been done a certain way does not necessarily make it the correct way. If you are the onsite manager in a building, you should make sure that all the tasks that are performed by outside contractors are not actually tasks that you should be performing yourself, otherwise you might be receiving a nasty bill in the future from the Owners Corporation.

If your caretaking agreement is vague or unclear when it refers to work that should be performed by a specialist tradesperson, the onsite manager and the Owners Corporation should always come to an understanding first before the onsite manager appoints any outside contractor. By knowing in advance whether or not a specialist can be appointed, the onsite manager will be able to avoid many disputes with the Owners Corporation.


Contact Us Now

Phone:+ 61 7 5552 6666
Fax:+ 61 7 5528 0955
Address:Level 2, 17 Welch St Southport, Qld, 4215
Postal:PO Box 1876
Southport 4215



Most Popular Articles

Management Rights News

Number of news items returned: 1 to 15 records of 111

The Different Types of Caretaking Agreements

17 November 2014


 Essentially, there are three types of caretaking agreements in the marketplace: “Do” agreements; “Supervisory” agreements; Hybrid “Do” and “Supervisory” agreements. “Do” Agreements A “Do” agreement ...

Unit Entitlement in NSW

11 February 2013


The issue of unit entitlement was recently looked at again as part of the Department of Fair Trading’s Discussion Paper ...


16 July 2015


This month, we continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be ...

Is it Time to Change the Management Rights Model?

13 May 2013


I think the time is right for the management rights industry to explore the creation of a new model. I ...

What Managers Need to know about the NSW Child Window Safety Devices Act 2013

17 January 2014


Resident building managers have general obligations under their Caretaking Agreements to assist Owners Corporations with building and compliance issues. Managers ...

Be Careful with your Proxies!

03 October 2013


In June this year, I wrote an article headed “Proxy Farming”, which set out the relevant restrictions on caretakers using ...

Short-Term Letting, Occupancy Limits And Tenant Representatives In NSW Strata

25 July 2017


Occupancy Limits By-laws in NSW may limit the number of adult residents in a lot. The limit however cannot be fewer ...

The Law Relating to Management Rights in Queensland

14 June 2010


This article looks at the legislation in Queensland dealing with the constraints and obligations imposed on developers whilst they control ...

Duty Bound or Duty Free - Do you know what Your Duties Are?

23 September 2013


The day-to-day care and maintenance of your resort facilities and communal areas is essential to its ongoing performance and success. ...

Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 2014


We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be ...

For Your Eyes Only!

15 April 2013


Information is a commodity and for many, information is power. As you would most likely know from personal experience, the right ...

Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 2013


In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability ...

Proxy Farming

10 June 2013


It is often stated that Strata and Community Schemes represent the “fourth tier of Government” and, as such, voting (either ...

"Legal Action", All those in Favour say "Why"

15 July 2013


I was recently involved in a New South Wales matter where an Executive Committee had received extensive legal advice from ...

Not Getting the Fundamentals Right

15 October 2013


A recent decision of the NSW Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has highlighted the importance of ensuring that the ...