Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 3: The Assignment Cycle

15 October 14

We continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be mindful of when considering the rights and obligations of the manager and owners corporation. The first two posts in this series looked at specialist duties and financier deeds. This month, I will be examining the all
important assignment provisions.


It is generally true that an assignment clause will only be used once in any manager’s tenure at a particular complex (twice if you count the acquisition of management rights). However, this is not always the case, as will become apparent in the discussion at the end of this post in relation to ‘deemed’ assignments.


The relative infrequency with which the assignment clause is used should not be taken as an indicator of the significance or importance of the clause. Given the relatively high turnover of management rights, particularly in holiday complexes, both managers an owners corporations may need to have regard to the assignment provisions of the
agreements on a regular basis.


Moreover, a poorly drafted assignment clause, which does not fairly balance the rights and obligations of the manager and owners corporation, can have a significant adverse impact on the manager’s business and the value of the management rights. Agreements that can’t be assigned or include unreasonable prohibitions on assignment are not worth much if they can’t be transferred to a buyer!


Unlike Queensland, where the consent to assignment may be given at committee level, the Strata Schemes anagement Act 1996 provides that the assignment of a caretaker agreement must be approved at a general meeting of the owners corporation. Accordingly, any clause which purports to confer authority on the executive committee to approve the
assignment is void and the consent of the owners corporation at general meeting should always be obtained.


Apart from the type of resolution required for the transfer of a caretaker agreement, the assignment of management rights is not regulated by the New South Wales legislation. Accordingly, the caretaking and letting agreements should contain provisions to ensure the assignment process is not frustrated by the owners corporation. Most importantly, a good assignment clause will include provisions to ensure the owners corporation:

  • cannot unreasonably withhold its consent to an assignment;
  • cannot require or receive a fee for approving the assignment (other than reimbursement for legal and administrative costs reasonably incurred); and
  • must make a decision on a proposed assignment within a certain timeframe.

In Queensland, these requirements are enshrined in the legislation.

The timeframe for an owners corporation to make a decision on a proposed assignment is usually 30 days. This period commences from when the owners corporation receives all of the information reasonably necessary to ma ke a decision. Sometimes, what information is ‘reasonably necessary’ will be specifically set out in the assignment clause. If not, we usually find that the owners corporation will (as a minimum) require the following information in relation to the assignee:

  • A resume;
  • At least two business references;
  • At least two personal references;
  • A business plan;
  • A Police check;
  • Evidence they hold all necessary licences; and
  • Evidence of financial standing.

It should be noted that, where the assignee is a company, the above information will usually be required in relation to the principal or working directors and, occasionally, the principal shareholders, of the company. Of course, in addition to the above information, the owners corporation will invariably require an interview with the proposed assignee (or its

directors/ shareholders).


Sometimes the agreements will also require information about the manager’s principal staff. Where such staff are not the principal directors or shareholders of the manger, the agreements will often require the manager to obtain the approval of the owners corporation to the appointment of such persons. This requirement is often separate from
the assignment clause and should be carefully considered by the manager anytime staff are introduced or replaced in the business.


In relation to financial standing, the owners corporation will often request a statem ent of financial position (i.e. asset and liability statement). If an incoming manager does not wish to disclose details of their assets and liabilities for personal or privacy reasons, the owners corporation will usually be satisfied with a copy of the letter of offer from the assignee’s financier (where they are obtaining funds from a financial institution to complete the purchase). The owners corporation will check to ensure that the funds are being provided on usual commercial terms and will generally rely on the bank’s assessment of the financial standing of the assignee.


A good assignment clause will specifically set out the relevant factors and considerations which the owners corporation may have regard in considering their consent. In Queensland, the legislation details the specific matters which the body corporate may have regard. These are:

  • The character of the assignee;
  • The financial standing of the assignee;
  • The proposed terms of the transfer;
  • The competence, qualifications and experience of the assignee;
  • The extent to which the assignee is likely to receive training; and
  • Any matters set out in the agreements.

It is often the case that assignment clauses in New South Wales will expressly detail the above considerations to reflect the position in Queensland. Where the assignment clause does not include such detail, the matters included in the Queensland legislation provide useful guidance about what the owners corporation should have regard to in making their decision.


Another important aspect to assignment clauses are any guarantee provisions. In most cases (but not always), the agreements will require guarantees to be given by the directors and/or shareholders of a corporate caretaker as a condition of the assignment. A reasonable clause should limit such guarantees to the principal directors/shareholders of
the manager. Issues may arise in situations where parties with only a minor interest in the management company, or who are not involved in the day-to-day operation of the business, are requested to provide guarantees.


It is also preferable that the assignment clause expressly provide for the outgoing manager (and any guarantors who guaranteed the performance of the outgoing manager’s obligations under the agreements) to be released by the owners corporation. Whilst such release will usually be drafted into the assignment do cumentation (regardless of what is
actually provided for under the agreements), the position is unclear as to whether the owners corporation can refuse to grant such release where not specifically provided for. To the extent that the assignment clause provides that the owners corporation cannot unreasonably refuse consent to an assignment, we consider the better view is that the
release must be given. Nonetheless, it is preferable that it is spelled out in the agreements to avoid any dispute.


Finally, managers should take heed of clauses which deem a change in shareholding or directors of a corporate manager to be an assignment. Such clauses will usually deem any change of shareholders or directors which alter the ‘effective control’ of the manager to be an assignment. Where such clauses are triggered, the manager will usually be required to comply with all of the requirements of the agreements in relation to assignment, including obtaining the prior written consent of the owners corporation (executive committee level would suffice in this instance).


Managers need to carefully bear such deeming clauses in mind if they intend to make any changes to the structure of their company. This is particularly so given the termination provisions of most caretaking and letting agreements include a clause allowing the owners corporation to terminate the agreements if the manager assigns their interest in the
agreements without the consent of the owners corporation. If consent is required but not obtained, it could be grounds for early termination of the agreements. If you are in any doubt about the requirements of your agreements, seek advice from your solicitor before making any changes to your company.   

Share

Contact Us Now

Phone:+ 61 7 5552 6666
Fax:+ 61 7 5528 0955
Email:info@smh.net.au
Address:Level 2, 17 Welch St Southport, Qld, 4215
Postal:PO Box 1876
Southport 4215

Search

Search*
Search

Most Popular Articles

Management Rights News

Number of news items returned: 1 to 15 records of 80

The Different Types of Caretaking Agreements

17 November 2014

(10125 views)

 Essentially, there are three types of caretaking agreements in the marketplace: “Do” agreements; “Supervisory” agreements; Hybrid “Do” and “Supervisory” agreements. “Do” Agreements A “Do” agreement ...

Unit Entitlement in NSW

11 February 2013

(8039 views)

The issue of unit entitlement was recently looked at again as part of the Department of Fair Trading’s Discussion Paper ...

What Managers Need to know about the NSW Child Window Safety Devices Act 2013

17 January 2014

(6484 views)

Resident building managers have general obligations under their Caretaking Agreements to assist Owners Corporations with building and compliance issues. Managers ...

CARETAKING AND LETTING AGREEMENT ESSENTIALS PART 5: DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND TERMINATION

16 July 2015

(6444 views)

This month, we continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be ...

Is it Time to Change the Management Rights Model?

13 May 2013

(6240 views)

I think the time is right for the management rights industry to explore the creation of a new model. I ...

The Law Relating to Management Rights in Queensland

14 June 2010

(5001 views)

This article looks at the legislation in Queensland dealing with the constraints and obligations imposed on developers whilst they control ...

Be Careful with your Proxies!

03 October 2013

(4911 views)

In June this year, I wrote an article headed “Proxy Farming”, which set out the relevant restrictions on caretakers using ...

Duty Bound or Duty Free - Do you know what Your Duties Are?

23 September 2013

(4476 views)

The day-to-day care and maintenance of your resort facilities and communal areas is essential to its ongoing performance and success. ...

Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 2013

(4299 views)

In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability ...

Proxy Farming

10 June 2013

(4020 views)

It is often stated that Strata and Community Schemes represent the “fourth tier of Government” and, as such, voting (either ...

Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 2014

(4005 views)

We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be ...

For Your Eyes Only!

15 April 2013

(3950 views)

Information is a commodity and for many, information is power. As you would most likely know from personal experience, the right ...

"Legal Action", All those in Favour say "Why"

15 July 2013

(3901 views)

I was recently involved in a New South Wales matter where an Executive Committee had received extensive legal advice from ...

Being Aware of your Rights and Responsibilities

14 January 2013

(3585 views)

Every resident building manager in NSW should have a copy of the booklet issued by the Department of Fair Trading ...

Manged Investment Schemes

15 July 2008

(3579 views)

You may have heard the terms ‘MIA’ or ‘Managed Investments Scheme’ and wondered what it’s all about. If you operate ...