Defamation - When is enough, enough?

16 April 14

As we all know, living or working in strata can get very personal. I am often amazed at what people say about others and their lack of concern about being sued for defamation. It is one thing to say it one-on-one; it is a completely different thing to say it in front of third parties or, even sillier, putting it in writing.
Resident building managers have often been the target of defamatory statements from committee members or owners. Obviously, you don’t want to be running off to your lawyer every time someone makes a statement about you that you don’t like. However, if you are the subject of a sustained barrage from someone who clearly has an agenda to defame and hurt you, you may be left with no choice other than to advise that person that you propose to commence defamation proceedings and, if necessary, move to the next stage of issuing a Concerns Notice. The key is to work out when enough is enough.

So what is defamation?

Defamation occurs when one person communicates (generally by word, internet, video or photographs) material which has the effect or tendency to damage the reputation of another, and the communication must be published or communicated to a third party. All States now have uniform defamation laws.

Words or materials are generally defamatory if they:

  • are likely to injure the reputation of a person by exposing that person to hurt, contempt or ridicule;
  • contain a statement about a person which would tend to make the person be shunned or avoided;
  • have a tendency to lower that person in the estimation of others.


How to commence an action for defamation

Any proceedings must be commenced within one year from the date of publication of the defamatory statement. Any individual person can sue, as well as a company employing less than 10 people.
Prior to commencing proceedings, it is recommended to first issue a “Concerns Notice” which identifies the defamation being complained of and gives the other party an opportunity to rectify the defamation or publish an apology. After that, it is off to Court!

Who is liable?

Generally, anyone who publishes or who authorises the publication of the defamatory statement. Proving the defamation is the key to the action.
Damages will be determined by the Judge but there is a maximum cap ($250,000.00 when the legislation was introduced) for damages for non-economic loss.

Defences to defamation

There are a number of defences to defamation, however, “justification”, is the big one. This is also commonly known as the defence of “truth”. Under the Act, truth is now a complete defence and there is no longer a requirement of public interest. However, the onus of proof falls on the publisher of the defamatory statement. That person must prove that the alleged defamatory statements were substantially true.

Criminal defamation

Criminal defamation is much more difficult to prove and also much more serious. It is a matter where the allegations being made are so serious and the harm done to the reputation of the person is so wrongful and so malicious that it is a matter prosecuted by the Police.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Disclaimer – This article is provided for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. 


Contact Us Now

Phone:+ 61 7 5552 6666
Fax:+ 61 7 5528 0955
Address:Level 2, 17 Welch St Southport, Qld, 4215
Postal:PO Box 1876
Southport 4215



Most Popular Articles

Management Rights News

Number of news items returned: 1 to 15 records of 113

The Different Types of Caretaking Agreements

17 November 2014


 Essentially, there are three types of caretaking agreements in the marketplace: “Do” agreements; “Supervisory” agreements; Hybrid “Do” and “Supervisory” agreements. “Do” Agreements A “Do” agreement ...

Unit Entitlement in NSW

11 February 2013


The issue of unit entitlement was recently looked at again as part of the Department of Fair Trading’s Discussion Paper ...


16 July 2015


This month, we continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be ...

Is it Time to Change the Management Rights Model?

13 May 2013


I think the time is right for the management rights industry to explore the creation of a new model. I ...

What Managers Need to know about the NSW Child Window Safety Devices Act 2013

17 January 2014


Resident building managers have general obligations under their Caretaking Agreements to assist Owners Corporations with building and compliance issues. Managers ...

Short-Term Letting, Occupancy Limits And Tenant Representatives In NSW Strata

25 July 2017


Occupancy Limits By-laws in NSW may limit the number of adult residents in a lot. The limit however cannot be fewer ...

Be Careful with your Proxies!

03 October 2013


In June this year, I wrote an article headed “Proxy Farming”, which set out the relevant restrictions on caretakers using ...

The Law Relating to Management Rights in Queensland

14 June 2010


This article looks at the legislation in Queensland dealing with the constraints and obligations imposed on developers whilst they control ...

Duty Bound or Duty Free - Do you know what Your Duties Are?

23 September 2013


The day-to-day care and maintenance of your resort facilities and communal areas is essential to its ongoing performance and success. ...

Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 2014


We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be ...

For Your Eyes Only!

15 April 2013


Information is a commodity and for many, information is power. As you would most likely know from personal experience, the right ...

Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 2013


In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability ...

Proxy Farming

10 June 2013


It is often stated that Strata and Community Schemes represent the “fourth tier of Government” and, as such, voting (either ...

"Legal Action", All those in Favour say "Why"

15 July 2013


I was recently involved in a New South Wales matter where an Executive Committee had received extensive legal advice from ...

Not Getting the Fundamentals Right

15 October 2013


A recent decision of the NSW Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has highlighted the importance of ensuring that the ...