Not Getting the Fundamentals Right

15 October 13

A recent decision of the NSW Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has highlighted the importance of ensuring that the fundamentals are right when entering into Management Rights agreements.


The decision related to a large, mixed commercial and residential scheme in Sydney comprising 117 lots being 111 residential lots, 1 caretaker lot and 5 commercial lots.


The developer sold the Management Rights to the building and the minutes of the first Annual General Meeting recorded a resolution appointing the management company as Building Manager on the terms and conditions contained in the written agreement. However, immediately, under the resolution, the following wording was included:-


“all owners (excluding the representative of the original owner) wish to register an objection to the motion as the contract is for a 10 year period and other quotes were not tabled at the meeting”.


Three years later, the Owners Corporation applied to the CTTT to have the Agreement declared void under Section 183A of the Strata Scheme Management Act (Act) on the basis that it was unfair, harsh, oppressive, unconscionable and unreasonable.


To demonstrate that the Agreement was unfair, the Owners Corporation tabled three (3) quotes to the Tribunal for provision of the caretaking duties at a fee well under the $157,612.00 originally being paid to the Caretaker. The Owners Corporation also argued that the Agreement was oppressive in that the Manager’s Lot (a standard two (2) bedroom unit) included on the title to the property the reception area in the foyer, numerous floor spaces throughout the building and multiple office and storage areas and garages. In effect, the area of the Manager’s lot was six (6) times the area of a typical Lot, yet the unit entitlement was the same as a standard two (2) bedroom unit in the complex (warning bells!).


The Tribunal decided:-


1. That the building was a “large Strata Scheme” as defined under the Act because it has more than 100 Lots.


2. The Act requires that an Owners Corporation of a large scheme must obtain at least two (2) quotes in relation to proposed expenditure in respect of any one item, if the proposed expenditure exceeds the amounts prescribed in the regulations.


3. The regulations prescribe an amount of $25,000.00 in relation to any one item or matter, (other than seeking legal advice or the provision of legal services or taking legal action).


4. Because the remuneration under the Caretaking agreement ($157,612.00) for the first year exceeded the $25,000.00 threshold, the Owners Corporation should have obtained two (2) quotes.


5. As only one (1) quote was obtained and put to the first Annual General Meeting and voted on, the resolution was a nullity and was declared void. Any contract entered into as a result of the illegitimate resolution had to be treated as being tainted and of no force.


6. The Tribunal also found under Section 183A(2) of the Act that the contract was not only unconscionable due to the circumstances proceeding the execution, but its continued existence was unreasonable and terminated the agreement forthwith.


LESSONS TO BE LEARNED


This case highlights the importance of developers getting it right when selling Management Rights and buyers of Management Rights ensuring that they only use legal practitioners experienced in this area.


The level of remuneration being paid for the provision of the caretaking services should have rung some alarm bells. A simple division of the commencing remuneration by the number of Lots would raise concerns for this type of inner city building with next to no gardens or grounds and where the primary cleaning duties relate to foyers, hallways, car parking areas and garbage disposal. Caretaker’s remuneration can always be reviewed under Section 183A of the Act.


Also, the unit entitlement attaching to the Manager’s lot should have raised immediate concern. Clearly, the unit entitlements were stacked firmly in favour of the owner of the Management lot and this was always going to be become a problem with the other owners.


Obtaining alternate caretaking quotes will need to be addressed when new buildings are brought on line.
 

Share

Contact Us Now

Phone:+ 61 7 5552 6666
Fax:+ 61 7 5528 0955
Email:info@smh.net.au
Address:Level 2, 17 Welch St Southport, Qld, 4215
Postal:PO Box 1876
Southport 4215

Search

Search*
Search

Most Popular Articles

Management Rights News

Number of news items returned: 1 to 15 records of 68

Unit Entitlement in NSW

11 February 2013

(5876 views)

The issue of unit entitlement was recently looked at again as part of the Department of Fair Trading’s Discussion Paper ...

The Different Types of Caretaking Agreements

17 November 2014

(5294 views)

 Essentially, there are three types of caretaking agreements in the marketplace: “Do” agreements; “Supervisory” agreements; Hybrid “Do” and “Supervisory” agreements. “Do” Agreements A “Do” agreement ...

What Managers Need to know about the NSW Child Window Safety Devices Act 2013

17 January 2014

(5021 views)

Resident building managers have general obligations under their Caretaking Agreements to assist Owners Corporations with building and compliance issues. Managers ...

Is it Time to Change the Management Rights Model?

13 May 2013

(4699 views)

I think the time is right for the management rights industry to explore the creation of a new model. I ...

Be Careful with your Proxies!

03 October 2013

(3663 views)

In June this year, I wrote an article headed “Proxy Farming”, which set out the relevant restrictions on caretakers using ...

The Law Relating to Management Rights in Queensland

14 June 2010

(3620 views)

This article looks at the legislation in Queensland dealing with the constraints and obligations imposed on developers whilst they control ...

Duty Bound or Duty Free - Do you know what Your Duties Are?

23 September 2013

(3289 views)

The day-to-day care and maintenance of your resort facilities and communal areas is essential to its ongoing performance and success. ...

Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 2013

(3213 views)

In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability ...

Proxy Farming

10 June 2013

(3022 views)

It is often stated that Strata and Community Schemes represent the “fourth tier of Government” and, as such, voting (either ...

"Legal Action", All those in Favour say "Why"

15 July 2013

(2839 views)

I was recently involved in a New South Wales matter where an Executive Committee had received extensive legal advice from ...

Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 2014

(2765 views)

We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be ...

CARETAKING AND LETTING AGREEMENT ESSENTIALS PART 5: DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND TERMINATION

16 July 2015

(2709 views)

This month, we continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be ...

For Your Eyes Only!

15 April 2013

(2703 views)

Information is a commodity and for many, information is power. As you would most likely know from personal experience, the right ...

Being Aware of your Rights and Responsibilities

14 January 2013

(2683 views)

Every resident building manager in NSW should have a copy of the booklet issued by the Department of Fair Trading ...

Manged Investment Schemes

15 July 2008

(2665 views)

You may have heard the terms ‘MIA’ or ‘Managed Investments Scheme’ and wondered what it’s all about. If you operate ...