Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 13

In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability cover of at least $10 million. Similar laws are in place in other jurisdictions around Australia.
To assist this process, the law requires schemes to be valued every five years by a registered valuer or quantity surveyor. It is fair to suggest that many schemes are underinsured, particularly in the period between valuations. For example, a scheme may be insured for $2 million based on a valuation. However, three or four years later the value of the scheme may have risen to $3 million or $4 million, but the insured value may not have changed. As a result, there will be inadequate funds available to reinstate or replace the property in the event of a major disaster.

It has been suggested that one option could be to increase the requirement for a valuation to every two or three years. However, this would add extra costs for schemes. Another option could be for the insured amount to be indexed annually by some formula, which may reduce the likelihood of schemes becoming underinsured.

The five year valuation requirement can mean that owners become complacent about their insurance needs. A number of other jurisdictions (eg New Zealand) do not require periodic valuations. Some argue that common sense and the fear of a lawsuit for underinsurance should be incentive enough for regular valuations, without the law needing to dictate to schemes how often they should be done.

Another approach is that taken in Queensland where schemes are required to disclose details about the insurance in notices for each AGM, including details about the most recent valuation. This may help to focus the attention of owners on insurance and the value of their shared assets on a regular basis.

What needs to be insured?

The National Disaster Insurance Review earlier last year looked at the issue of strata insurance in the wake of Cyclone Yasi in Northern Queensland. A number of submissions to that review suggested that strata insurance risks becoming unaffordable for many schemes.

One element that affects the cost of premiums is what is covered by the policy. The law in NSW currently requires policies to cover most owner improvements and fixtures (eg kitchen cupboards, toilets etc). However, some other jurisdictions take a different approach. For instance, South Australia excludes owners’ fixtures and fittings. It has been suggested that adopting similar measures in NSW may help to lower the premiums for schemes. It would also address the issue of ‘double insurance’ as such items are already covered by owners who have home and contents insurance policies. Tenant fixtures are currently excluded by the law from being covered by the scheme’s insurance.

The law in NSW sets out a number of incidental matters that must be covered by all policies (eg the cost of removing debris and employing architects). These would be standard features of most policies and the need for the legislation is unclear. Other incidental matters, such as temporary accommodation expenses for owners and tenants, are not required by law. A large impact on the cost of insurance is the excess payable in the majority of policies. In NSW most policies would have an excess in the hundreds of dollars. Most claims are for amounts less than $1,000.00. Encouraging or requiring schemes to have a higher excess payable could reduce the number of claims and, in turn, the overall cost of insurance.

Exemptions from compulsory insurance

Under the current law only two lot schemes can agree not to be insured and then only if the buildings are physically detached. There is an anomaly in that schemes of more than two lots may be also be physically detached but are still required to be insured under one policy.

Increased premiums based on lot usage

Under the current law where the use of a particular lot (eg a café) causes the insurance premium for the scheme to be greater than it would otherwise be, the extra cost can be passed onto the owners concerned (with their consent or by an Adjudicator’s order). A similar provision exists in the Queensland legislation. However, it can be difficult to determine exactly how much of the premium is attributable to the use by the lot owner or their tenant.

Public liability cover

Some stakeholders believe that the current $10 million minimum level of public liability insurance is too low. There have been calls to increase the minimum level of cover to $20 million. Others suggest the minimum amount should be $30 million. Increasing the level of coverage would increase costs for schemes. No jurisdiction in Australia currently has a requirement for more than $10 million in public liability coverage.


Contact Us Now

Phone:+ 61 7 5552 6666
Fax:+ 61 7 5528 0955
Address:Level 2, 17 Welch St Southport, Qld, 4215
Postal:PO Box 1876
Southport 4215



Most Popular Articles

Management Rights News

Number of news items returned: 1 to 15 records of 111

The Different Types of Caretaking Agreements

17 November 2014


 Essentially, there are three types of caretaking agreements in the marketplace: “Do” agreements; “Supervisory” agreements; Hybrid “Do” and “Supervisory” agreements. “Do” Agreements A “Do” agreement ...

Unit Entitlement in NSW

11 February 2013


The issue of unit entitlement was recently looked at again as part of the Department of Fair Trading’s Discussion Paper ...


16 July 2015


This month, we continue our examination of various clauses within caretaking and letting agreements and the important considerations to be ...

Is it Time to Change the Management Rights Model?

13 May 2013


I think the time is right for the management rights industry to explore the creation of a new model. I ...

What Managers Need to know about the NSW Child Window Safety Devices Act 2013

17 January 2014


Resident building managers have general obligations under their Caretaking Agreements to assist Owners Corporations with building and compliance issues. Managers ...

Be Careful with your Proxies!

03 October 2013


In June this year, I wrote an article headed “Proxy Farming”, which set out the relevant restrictions on caretakers using ...

Short-Term Letting, Occupancy Limits And Tenant Representatives In NSW Strata

25 July 2017


Occupancy Limits By-laws in NSW may limit the number of adult residents in a lot. The limit however cannot be fewer ...

The Law Relating to Management Rights in Queensland

14 June 2010


This article looks at the legislation in Queensland dealing with the constraints and obligations imposed on developers whilst they control ...

Duty Bound or Duty Free - Do you know what Your Duties Are?

23 September 2013


The day-to-day care and maintenance of your resort facilities and communal areas is essential to its ongoing performance and success. ...

Caretaking and Letting Agreement Essentials Part 1

03 September 2014


We regularly prepare caretaking and letting agreements for new developments. However, it has become increasingly common for us to be ...

For Your Eyes Only!

15 April 2013


Information is a commodity and for many, information is power. As you would most likely know from personal experience, the right ...

Owners Corporation Insurance - How do we Stop the Spiraling Costs?

12 August 2013


In NSW, all strata schemes are required to be insured for the full replacement value, as well as public liability ...

Proxy Farming

10 June 2013


It is often stated that Strata and Community Schemes represent the “fourth tier of Government” and, as such, voting (either ...

"Legal Action", All those in Favour say "Why"

15 July 2013


I was recently involved in a New South Wales matter where an Executive Committee had received extensive legal advice from ...

Not Getting the Fundamentals Right

15 October 2013


A recent decision of the NSW Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has highlighted the importance of ensuring that the ...